I haven’t read any novels by the latest Booker Prize winner, Hungarian author Laszlo Krasznahorkai, but I found myself singing his praises as I settled down this morning to read my newspaper.
The reason was simple: in the course of accepting his award, he made a point of explicitly thanking his various translators. Now, this may not seem especially noteworthy, but, as someone who has worked as a translator in the past, I can assure you that it is all too rare.
Given that the British public is currently enjoying an unprecedented love affair with translated European (crime) fiction, one might think that translators would be mentioned more frequently in dispatches. More often than not, however, they are accorded little more than a line or two in reviews.
Even this is no guarantee. Perusing a second-hand bookshop last week, I was astonished to discover that a translated work of Thomas Mann – Thomas Mann! – didn’t even say who the translator was. Having struggled to get to grips with Mann in the original German, I am aware of the enormous difficulty that exists in rendering his work satisfactorily in English. To remain uncredited for what must have been an enormously challenging and time-consuming task seems particularly negligent. The sentences that appear in English are not Thomas Mann’s, after all: they are the translator’s.
Which brings me back to Laszlo Krasznahorkai.
To acknowledge the hard work of his translators is a rare thing; to thank them publicly for their it practically unheard of.
Let’s hope it’s the start of a new literary trend.
It can sometimes be hard to shake off one’s preconceptions of something.
Long before I went anywhere near an electric car, I was certain of two things: one, they couldn’t go very fast; two, they couldn’t go very far.
Where I obtained this information, I am not sure. I don’t watch Top Gear – at the time of writing no-one does – but I can’t help but feel that this programme (or more likely, the views of one of its presenters) somehow informed my view of electric mobility.
What a nice surprise, then, to have these initial perceptions completely overturned.
Last summer I spent no more than 15 minutes as a passenger in a Tesla Roadster. Perhaps it was the fact that the top was down, or that it was a beautiful May evening (there may even have been a beer or two involved). Whatever: the Roadster can move. I remember not only the wind in my hair, but the slightly anxious feeling in my stomach (I am not a born adventurer, even after alcohol consumption). We were travelling fast – but the most amazing thing was that we barely made a sound. Almost a year later, I still don’t really understand how all that acceleration could have been quite so silent.
As for range, during the same May weekend I had the privilege of hitching a ride in a world-record breaking vehicle: Metron 7, a converted Mazda 5. Barely six months after it transported me around southern Germany, Andrej and Jasna’s creation had travelled a whopping 726 kilometres on a single charge, all the way from Bled to Dubrovnik (for a fuller account, check out www.capscovil.com). An amazing achievement, and one that deserves to hold the world record for years to come.
So, there you have it. Electric vehicles can go fast. Electric vehicles can go long. Most importantly, however, electric vehicles can be different from another: some are built for speed; others are built for endurance.
But don’t take my word for it (writers can be an unreliable bunch); get out and see for yourself!
I’m not sure what it is about writers’ routines that fascinates me, only that whenever I chance upon them I am eager to discover more.
The same goes for the concept of writers’ block. Does it exist? Or is it a by-product of a lack of routine?
I started turning these questions over in my head at some point last week when I was reading a book by crime writer Lawrence Block. The book was a reissue and contained a three-page introduction by the author himself.
Now, Mr Block does not exactly deal in high literature but his books are nevertheless fast, funny and well put-together. Therefore, I was amazed to read that at the time of writing the novel had found its way into my possession, Mr Block had been in the habit of producing a book every month.
A book every month?
That’s twelve books a year!
The mind boggles.
But then again, I asked myself, would it be so hard?
2,000 words a day for 30 days… would be OK – just about. But then to have to do it again twelve times?
But then what choice did he have? With a name like Block, people might have started to make assumptions.
The fact that I am writing a post about New Year’s resolutions on the 5th rather than the 1st of January should tell you everything you need to know.
Like many people, I awoke last Thursday morning with a sore head, nursing a thousand promises I knew I could never keep. The first of these, of course, was to write more; the second to drink less. Already I have fallen foul of both of these simple directives (even if I could cite various mitigating factors in my defence).
Still, every cloud has a silver lining: though I have failed to keep to my resolutions, I have, nevertheless, had cause to think about why.
The reason for my failure, I think, is straightforward enough. Simply, I had unrealistic expectations of myself. After all, why make ten resolutions if you know you are only going to keep one?
Since I decided some time last week that it was OK to make a single resolution, things have become far easier.
My goal for 2015? To make better use of my time on the commute to work.
As I write, I am sitting on a crowded train.
Probably that means nothing to you, but to me it feels like the start of something new.